Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Department of Animal and Poultry Science, Faculty of Animal Science, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Golestan , Iran

2 Professor,Faculty of Animal Science, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources

3 Associate Professo Faculty of Animal Science, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources

4 economical Agricultural ,Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources

Abstract

The effect of energy expression system and total amino acid database on growth performance, carcass components and litter quality of Ross 308 broilers strain was studied by 180 broiler chicks in a completely randomized design with a 2×3 factorial arrangement. This study was performed with six treatments, three replicates and ten broiler chicks in each replicate. Treatments expression was with two systems of energy (AMEn and TMEn) and three amino acid database (NRC, Evonik and Ajinomoto) in periods starter (1-10 days), grower and (11-24 days) finisher (25-42 days). Apparent metabolizable energy corrected for nitrogen in the dietary formulation caused a relative increase in feed intake and weight gain of broilers in the grower and whole period of experiment (1-42 days). Energy system had no significant effect on feed conversion ratio, protein and energy utilization, carcass components and litter quality (P>0.05). Evaluating feed conversion ratio, efficiency of energy and protein utilization, European production index during total experiment period showed that NRC and Evonik amino acid databases were significantly better than Ajinomoto (P<0.05). Based on the current results, it seems that NRC and Evonik amino acid databases, in the condition of current experiment have relatively some advantage compared to Ajinomoto database.

Keywords

یاری، پ.، یعقوبفر، ا.، شهریار، ح.، ابراهیم­نژاد، ی.، گودرزی، س. و پاپی، ن. (1394). تأثیر شیوه­های مختلف بیان و تأمین اسیدهای آمینه و انرژی قابل متابولیسم جیره­های غذایی بر فراسنجه­های تولیدی و متابولیک جوجه­های گوشتی سویه‌ی آرین. نشریه‌ی علوم دامی. شماره‌ی 106. ص. ص. 245-243.
یعقوب‌فر، ا.، کرکودی، ک. و دیباییان، م. (a 1390). تأثیر سیستم­های متفاوت بیان انرژی قابل متابولیسم و اسید­های آمینه در جیره­های غذایی، بر عملکرد و خصوصیات لاشه‌ی جوجه­های گوشتی. نشریه‌ی پژوهش­های تولیدات دامی. جلد 2. ص. ص. 11-1.
یعقوب‌فر، ا.، نادی­پور، ا. و افضل شریفی‌زاده، ا. (b1390). اثرات انرژی قابل متابولیسم ظاهری و حقیقی تصحیح شده برای ازت با اسید­های آمینه­ی کل و قابل هضم جیره­های غذایی بر عملکرد جوجه‌های گوشتی. نشریه علوم دامی. جلد 90. ص.ص. 46-34.
Ajinomoto Heartland. )2010(. Chicago.http://aaa. lysine. Com. /AA Table/ ingredients.
Ajuyah, A. O., Lee, K. H., Hardin, R. T. and Sim, J. S. )1991(. Changes in the yield and in fed full fat oil seeds. Journal of Poultry Science. 70: 2304-2314.
AOAC. (2016). Official methods of analysis. 16th ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Arlington.
VA.
Coufal, C. D., Chavez, C., Niemeyer, P. R. and Carey, J. B. )2006(. Measurement of broiler litter production rates and nutrient content using recycled litter. Poultry Science. 85: 398-403
Dale, N. and Batal, A. )2015(. J-Poultry Web. http://www.poultry.uga.edu/soybeans /metabolizable energy sbm.pps. Accessed on September 12. 2015
Evonic Industries. )2010(. Amino Data 3.0, Platinum version. Feed additive. Degussa AG, Hanau-Wolfgang, Germany. http://www.aminodat.com.
Hughes, R. J. and Choct, M. )1999(. Chemical and physical characteristics of grains related to variability in energy and amino acid availability in poultry. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research. 50: 689-701.
Khosravi, M. Dastar, B. Aalami, M. Shawrang, P. and Ashayerizadeh, O. (2016). Comparison of gamma-irradiation and enzyme supplemention to eliminate antinutritional factors in rice bran in broiler chicken diets.
Livestock Science. 191: 51-56.
Kong, C. and  Adeola, O. (2016). Determination of ileal digestible and apparent metabolizable energy contents of expeller- extracted and solvent- extracted canola meals for broiler chickens by the regression method. Springer Plus. 5: 693.
Lesson, S. and Summers, J. D. )2001(. Scotts nutrition of the 4th ed. Guelph, Ontario. 591p.
NRC. )1994(. Nutrient Requirements of Poultry. 9th ed. National Academic Press, Washington DC. 176p.
Ojano-Dirain, C. P. and Waldroup, P.W. )2002(. Protein and amino acid needs of broilers in warm weather: A review. Journal of Poultry Science. 1: 40-46.
Perreault, N. and Leeson, S. )1992(. Age-related carcass composition changes in male broiler chickens. Canadian Journal of Animal Science. 72: 919-929.
SAS (Statistical Analysis System). 2008. SAS/STAT® 9.2. User's Guide. SAS Institute Inc. Cary, North Carolina. USA.
Ross Broiler. )2014(. Manangement manual. Aviagen. http:// www.aviagen.com.
Sibbald, I. R. )1986(. Metabolizable energy evaluation of poultry diets. Recent Advance in Animal Nutrition. 30: 12-15.
Tahir, M. and Pesti, G. M. )2012(. Comparison of ingredient usage and formula costs in poultry feeds using different amino acid digestibility databases. Journal of Poultry Science. 21: 693-705.
Wolynetz, M. S. and Sibbald, I. R. )1984(. Relationship between apparent and true metabolizable energy and the effect of the nitrogen correction. Journal of Poultry Science. 63: 1386-1399.
Yaghobfar, A. )2016(. The efficiency of AMEn and TMEn utilization for NE in broiler diets. Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science. 18: 126-136.
Yari, P., Yaghobfar, A., Aghdan Shahryar, H., Ebrahimnezhad, Y. and Mirzaie Goudarzi, S. )2015(. Effects of diets formulation based on different methods of metabolisable Energy (AMEn & TMEn) and amino acids (TAA & DAA) expression on performance, energy and protein efficiency ratio and productive efficiency factor of broiler chicks. International Journal of Biological Forum. 7: 73-78.
Zarei, A., Mohamadi, M. and Hemmati, B. 2014. Metabolizable energy and chemical composition of poultry by- product meal. Iranian Journal of Applied Animal Science. 4: 849-853.