Effects of feed form, probiotic and enzyme in triticale based diets on performance, microbial population, viscosity and pH of digestive tract and intestinal morphology of broiler chickens

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 R Khuzestan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center: ahvaz, golestan, Iran

2 Faculty member

Abstract

In present study of effects of feed form, probiotic and enzyme was investigated on performance, microbial population, viscosity, intestinal morphology and pH of digestive organs in broilers fed triticale-based diet. Eight dietary treatments consisted of feed form (pellet or mash) with or without a Bacillus-based probiotic (0.03% diet) and enzyme carbohydrates (0.05% diet) in a 2 × 2 × 2 factorial arrangement with 4 replicates for each treatment in 42 days. The highest Weight Gain in starter period was for the broiler chicks fed the pelleted diet with enzyme and probiotic but the differences were not significant at the end of period. Also, pelleted diet containing probiotic and pelleted diet containing probiotic and enzyme, had the lowest feed conversion ratio during the starter and growth period, respectively. Microbial population, pH of digestive organs and intestinal morphology were not significantly affected by addition of experimental treatments but, feed form has a significant effect on ileum viscosity. In conclusion, pellet form and supplementation of a triticale-based diet with enzymes and probiotics improved the growth performance during starter period and intestinal viscosity of broiler chicks, but did not improved performance at the end of period.

Keywords

References

  1. -خجسته شلمانی، س. و شیوازاد، م. (1384). تأثیر شکل پلت و آردی جیره‌های متداول بر عملکرد سویه‌های گوشتی آرین. مجله‌ی علمی-پژوهشی کشاورزی. شماره‌ی 1، ص ص. 200-193.

    2-شریعتمداری، ف. و محیطی اصلی، م. (1387). افزودنیهای خوراک دام، طیور و آبزیان. تألیف چاپ اول. مرکز نشر آثار علمی دانشگاه تربیت مدرس. ص 413.

    3-یوسفی کلاریکلایی، ک. محیطی اصلی، م. حسینی، ع.  و یوسفی کلاریکلایی، ح. (1391). اثرات آنتی‌بیوتیک، پری بیوتیک و پروبیوتیک و مولتی آنزیم در جیره‌های پلت شده بر عملکرد جوجه‌های گوشتی. تحقیقات تولیدات دامی. سال اول، ص ص.  72-63.  

    4.Amerah, A.M., Ravindran, V., Lentle, R.G., Thomas, D.G. (2008). Influence of feed particle size on the performance, energy utilization, digestive tract development, and digesta parameters of broiler starters fed wheat- and corn- based diets. Poultry  Science., 87:2320–2328.

    1. Awad,W.A., K.Ghareeb, S.Abdel-Raheem and J.Bohm (2009) Effects of dietary inclusion of probiotic and synbiotic on growth performance, organ weights and intestinal histomorphology of broiler chickens. Poultry Science., 88: 49-56.

    6.Beski,S.S.M. and S.Y.T.Al-Sardary (2015) Effects of Dietary Supplementation of Probiotic and Synbiotic on Broiler Chickens Hematology and Intestinal Integrity.International Journal of Poultry Science., 14(1): 31-36.

    7.Choct, M. and Annison, G. (1992). The inhibition of nutrient digestion by wheat pentosans. British Journal of Nutrition. 67:123-132.

    1. Deschepper,K., M.Lippens, G.Huyghebaert and K.Molly (2003) The effect of aromabiotic and Gali d’or on technical performances and intestinal morphology of broilers. In: Proccedings of 14th. European Symposium on poultry nutrition. August. Lillehammer, Norway.189pp.

    9.Fioramonti, J., Theodorou, V., and Bueno, L. (2003). Probiotics and their effect on gut physiology. Best Practice & Research Clinical Gastroenterology. 17: 711- 724.

    10.Jalleh, S., Golian, A. Hassanabadi, A. and Mir-Gholeng, S.A. (2013). Effect of different levels of high-fat extrude soybean on performance, blood metabolites and gut mucosal morphology of broiler chicken. Iranian Journal of Animal Science Research. 5(2):182-189.

    11.Liopis,M., M.Antolin, F.Guarner, A.Salas and J.R.Malagelada (2005) Mucosal colonisation with Lactobacillus casei mitigates barrier injury induced by exposure to trinitronbenze-ne sulphonic acid. Gut., 54:955-959.

    12.Mazhari, M., Golian, A.  and Kermanshahi, H. (2014). Using of wheat by-products with or without enzyme supplementation in growing diet of broiler chickens. Iranian Journal of Animal Science Research. 5(2):84-94.

    13.Mireles-Arriaga, A. I., Espinosa-Ayala, E. Hernández-García,P.A., Márquez Molina, O. (2015). Use of Exogenous Enzyme in Animal Feed. Life Science Journal. 12(2):23-32.

    14.Mirza,R.A. (2009) Using prepared synbiotic in early feeding of broiler chicken and its effect on some productive, physiological and histological performance and carcass characteri- stics. Master Science thesis. University of Salahddin-Erbil-Agriculture College. 130pp.

    15.Mirzaie,S., M.Zaghari, S.Aminzadeh and M.Shivazad (2012) The effects of non-starch polysaccharides content of wheat and xylanase supplementation on the intestinal amylase, aminopeptidase and lipase activities, ileal viscosity and fat digestibility in layer diet. Iraian Journal of Biotechnology., 10(3):208-214.

    16.Mozafar S, Mehdizadeh S, Lotfollahian H, Shahne AZ, Mirzaei F, Alinejad A. (2012). Study on efficacy of probiotic in broiler chickens diet. Agricultural Sciences. 3(1): 5-8

    17.Nourollahi, H., Solhjou, A., Agah, M.J., Ilami, B., Hashemi, M. and Hashemi, M.(2014). The effect of replacing two new varieties of triticale instead of corn in diets on broiler performance. In: The 6th Iranian congress on animal science.Tabriz university.26 and 27 August, 2014.5 pages.

    18.Olnood,C.G., S.S.M.Beski, M.Choct and P.A.Iji (2015) Novel probiotics: Their effects on growth performance, gut development, microbial community and activity of broiler chickens. Animal Nutrition.,1:184-191

    19.Pirgozliev, V., Rose, S. P.,  Pellny, T., Amerah, A.M., Wickramasinghe, M., Ulker, M. Rakszegi, M. Bedo, Z.  Shewry, P. R.  and Lovegrove, A. (2015). Energy utilization and growth performance of chickens fed novel wheat inbred lines selected for different pentosan levels with and without xylanase supplementation. Poultry Science. 94(2): 232-239.

    20.Pourreza, J., Sanie, A.H., Rowghani, E. (2007). Effect of supplemental enzyme on nutrition digestibility and performance of broiler chicks fed on diets containing triticale. International Journal of Poultry Science. 6:115-117.

    21.Rane, R.S. and Nemade, P.P. (1996). Advantages of pellet feed and its qualitative importance. Poultry Advisor. 29(2) 25 – 27

    22.Smits, C. H. M., Veldman, A., Verstegen. M. W. A., and Beynen, A. (1997). Dietary carboxymethylcellulose with high instead of low viscosity reduces macronutrient digestion in broiler chickens. Journal of Nutrition. 127: 483– 487.

    23.Songsak,C., O.Chinrasri, T.Somchan, S.Ngamluan and S.Soychuta (2008) Effect of dietary inclusion of cassava yeast as probiotic source on growth performance, small intestine (ileum) morphology and carcass characteristic in broilers. International Journal of Poultry Science., 7: 246-250.

    24.Svihus, B., Klovstad, K.H., Perez, V., Zimonja, O., Sahlstrom, S., Schuller, R.B.( 2004) Physical and nutriti- onal effects of pelleting of broiler chicken diets made from wheat ground to different coarse -nesses by the use of roller mill and hammer mill. Animal Feed Science and Technology.117:281–293.

    25.Vieira,S.L., A.M.Penz, A.M.Kessler and E.V.Jr.Catellan (1995) A nutritional valuation of triticale in broiler diets. The Journa of Applied Poultry Research., 4:352-355.

    26.Yang, Y., Iji, P. A., Kocher, A., mikkelsen, L. L. and Choct, M. (2008). Effects of dietary mannanoligosccharide on growth performance, nutrient digestibility and gut development of broilers given different cereal-based diets. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition. 92: 650-659.

    27.Yu, B., Wu, S.  Liu, C. Gauthier, R. and Chiou, P. W. S. (2007). Effects of enzyme inclusion in a maize-soybean diet on broiler performance. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 134:283-294

Animal Sciences Journal
Volume 32, Issue 123
September 2019
Pages 271-284

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics